≈ $6,800
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 2.45 kg
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 2,009
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
Alternatives to Razer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 95 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,105 vs 24,277
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 95 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 95 Wh
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.45 kg
- IR camera (face login)
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 2.45 kg
- HDR
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 2,009
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 175 W
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 95 Wh
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,145 vs 24,277
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,504 vs 16,817
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.45 kg
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 19,038 vs 16,817
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 95 Wh
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 95 Wh
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- HDR
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,848 vs 24,277