≈ $4,900
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 250 Hz vs 144 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 27,150 vs 16,441
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 3.2 kg vs 2.89 kg
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 18 HX AI RTX 5070 (2025)
10 desktop replacements at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 18 HX AI RTX 5070 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Stealth 18 HX AI RTX 5070 (2025)
≈ $5,400
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 32,908 vs 16,441
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Weight 3.5 kg vs 2.89 kg
- Thickness 30 mm vs 24 mm
≈ $8,300
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $5,400
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 27,180 vs 16,441
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $7,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 30,865 vs 16,441
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $7,100
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 144 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 100 Wh
≈ $4,800
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- GPU shader cores 10,496 vs 4,608
- Weight 3.6 kg vs 2.89 kg
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 32 GB
≈ $4,900
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,447 vs 16,441
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,901 vs 16,441
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
≈ $5,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,723 vs 16,441
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Weight 3.6 kg vs 2.89 kg