13% pricier ≈ $4,700
- GPU power (TGP) 160 W vs 125 W
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 39 TFLOPS vs 32 TFLOPS
- Upgradable RAM
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3 RTX 5080 (2026)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 16 AI+ B3 RTX 5080 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $4,200
9.1
Alternatives to the Stealth 16 AI+ B3 RTX 5080 (2026)
12% pricier ≈ $4,600
- SSD (up to) 3,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 125 W
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Upgradable RAM
15% cheaper ≈ $3,500
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16 mm vs 20 mm
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 125 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 32 TFLOPS
18% cheaper ≈ $3,400
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16 mm vs 20 mm
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,532 vs 21,645
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
12% pricier ≈ $4,700
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,710 vs 21,645
13% cheaper ≈ $3,600
- Weight 1.8 kg vs 1.99 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Advanced Optimus
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,674 vs 21,645
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
14% pricier ≈ $4,700
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Weight 1.65 kg vs 1.99 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- GPU power (TGP) 85 W vs 125 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,738 vs 21,645
6% cheaper ≈ $3,900
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 1.99 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 125 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 32 TFLOPS
15% cheaper ≈ $3,500
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight 1.58 kg vs 1.99 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 90 Wh
14% cheaper ≈ $3,600
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- Weight 1.88 kg vs 1.99 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,371 vs 21,645
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz