Same price ≈ $4,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
Alternatives to MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $4,900
9.4
Alternatives to the Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026)
8% cheaper ≈ $4,500
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 1 ms
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Advanced Optimus
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
15% cheaper ≈ $4,200
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.6 kg
- Thickness 26 mm vs 29 mm
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
Same price ≈ $4,900
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
20% pricier ≈ $5,900
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
7% cheaper ≈ $4,600
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,227 vs 28,614
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.6 kg
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 128 GB
4% pricier ≈ $5,100
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Vapor chamber cooling
- Video memory 12 GB vs 24 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
23% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 1 ms
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Advanced Optimus
- Video memory 12 GB vs 24 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
23% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
20% cheaper ≈ $3,900
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.6 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 24 GB