- GPU compute (FP32) 16.2 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,269 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 6,144 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to HP Victus 16 AMD GTX 1650 (2021)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Victus 16 AMD GTX 1650 (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Victus 16 AMD GTX 1650 (2021)
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.2 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,878 vs 3,319
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.4 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,814 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.9 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,584 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 17.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,729 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.4 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 6,077 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.4 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,591 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.4 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.9 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,010 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.4 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 17.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,456 vs 3,319
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.4 kg
- SD card reader
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,407 vs 3,319
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.4 kg
- SD card reader