≈ $1,900
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 88 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 1,024 GB
Alternatives to HP Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)
≈ $1,300
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,336 vs 3,263
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
≈ $1,300
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.1 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 70 Wh
- SD card reader
≈ $920
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.2 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 6,316 vs 3,263
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 40 W vs 50 W
≈ $2,700
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Webcam 1,080p vs 720p
- Weight 2.37 kg vs 2.29 kg
- Thickness 30 mm vs 23.5 mm
≈ $1,250
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 50 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,783 vs 3,263
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
≈ $1,450
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 50 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,448 vs 3,263
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
≈ $970
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 75 W vs 50 W
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
≈ $1,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,364 vs 3,263
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
≈ $2,000
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 50 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,463 vs 3,263
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.29 kg