vs
7.5Battery & portability3.5
3.9Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023) | Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 255 mm | 269 mm | −14 mm |
| Width | 357.9 mm | 357 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 30 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023) better than Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Weight2.29 kg vs 2.37 kg+3%
- Thickness23.5 mm vs 30 mm+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)?
- GPU shader cores1,024 vs 4,6084.5×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023): Yes
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce GTX 1650 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 50 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | — |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 1,024 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 3.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3,263 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 5600H | — |
| CPU maker | AMD | — |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 5600H, Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 7 5800H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 6,913 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 1,889 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 455 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | — |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | — |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | — |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 16 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,024 GB | — |
| SSD (base) | 256 GB | — |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | — |
| Power adapter | 200 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.29 kg | 2.37 kg |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 357.9 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 255 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | White, Black, Silver, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)vsMSI Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023)3.73.8vs
HP Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)vsMSI Katana 17 B13 RTX 3050 (2023)3.73.6
vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsHP Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)3.93.7vs
HP Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023)3.73.6vs
HP Victus 15 AMD GTX 1650 (2023)vsHP Victus 16 AMD GTX 1650 (2021)3.73.8
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.66.6