≈ $2,150
- Video memory 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 91 Wh vs 83 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)
≈ $4,900
- Video memory 64 GB vs 4 GB
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,048
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thickness 26 mm vs 23 mm
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.1 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,447 vs 5,246
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 95 W
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,672 vs 5,246
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.9 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 2,048
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 8 vs 12
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 15 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,630 vs 5,246
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.6 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,021 vs 5,246
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 2.29 kg
- SSD (base) 256 GB vs 512 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,194 vs 5,246
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 4 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- USB-A ports 1 vs 3
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,575 vs 5,246
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- USB-A ports 1 vs 3