vs
8.6Memory & storage5.5
8.7Battery & portability8.8
5.5Features & cooling3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)
| Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022) | Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 248 mm | 262 mm | −14 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 395 mm | −26 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 26 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022) better than Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022): No
- CPU cores12 vs 8+50%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- Thickness23 mm vs 26 mm+13%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) better than Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)?
- Video memory4 GB vs 64 GB16×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 91 Wh+10%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 64 GB8×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- Screen size16.1″ vs 17.3″+7%
- Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 95 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | — |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,246 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 12 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-12500H, Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,812 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,281 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 779 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 91 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.29 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 248 mm | 262 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Key travel | 1.6 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)5.86.3
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)5.87.6
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)5.86.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.85.7
vs
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513 RTX 3060 (2022)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)5.85.8
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2022)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4080 (2023)5.88.1

