16% cheaper ≈ $4,900
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 512 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
Alternatives to Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5090 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5090 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $5,900
9.7
Alternatives to the Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5090 (2026)
18% cheaper ≈ $4,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,007 vs 29,961
21% pricier ≈ $7,100
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 99 Wh
29% cheaper ≈ $4,200
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
23% cheaper ≈ $4,500
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 1 ms
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 17,190 vs 16,188
- CPU cores 20 vs 16
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
32% cheaper ≈ $4,000
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 21,127 vs 16,188
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
18% cheaper ≈ $4,900
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
22% cheaper ≈ $4,600
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,227 vs 29,961
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.3 kg
35% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
26% cheaper ≈ $4,400
- Refresh rate 180 Hz vs 165 Hz
- SSD (base) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 30 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS