Same price ≈ $4,900
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 28,614 vs 25,007
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
Alternatives to Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5080 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5080 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $4,800
9.7
Alternatives to the Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5080 (2026)
13% cheaper ≈ $4,200
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
6% cheaper ≈ $4,500
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 1 ms
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,719 vs 25,007
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 17,190 vs 16,188
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
22% pricier ≈ $5,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 29,961 vs 25,007
- Video memory 24 GB vs 16 GB
17% cheaper ≈ $4,000
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 21,127 vs 16,188
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.3 kg
5% cheaper ≈ $4,600
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,227 vs 25,007
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.3 kg
Same price ≈ $4,900
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
21% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
9% cheaper ≈ $4,400
- Refresh rate 180 Hz vs 165 Hz
- SSD (base) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 10,575 vs 16,188
15% cheaper ≈ $4,100
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,935 vs 25,007
- Advanced Optimus
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.3 kg