- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight 1.5 kg vs 1.9 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.5 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 55 W vs 65 W
- Upgradable RAM
Alternatives to Asus Vivobook Pro 16 K6602 RTX 4060 (2023)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Vivobook Pro 16 K6602 RTX 4060 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Vivobook Pro 16 K6602 RTX 4060 (2023)
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight 1.5 kg vs 1.9 kg
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 96 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 55 W vs 65 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.3 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS
≈ $2,700
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Weight 1.7 kg vs 1.9 kg
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.5 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS
- MUX switch
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 65 W
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- MUX switch
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 65 W
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 65 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 96 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 65 W
- GPU power (TGP) 70 W vs 65 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,934 vs 7,985
- CPU cores 14 vs 10
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 96 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.5 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 50 W vs 65 W
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 96 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- GPU power (TGP) 50 W vs 65 W
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 96 Wh