Same price ≈ $2,000
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.7 kg
- GPU shader cores 1,536 vs 1,024
- Thickness 26 mm vs 28 mm
- SSD (up to) 128 GB vs 512 GB
- SSD (base) 128 GB vs 512 GB
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- Asus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Asus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the FX705D GTX 1650 (2019) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)
21% pricier ≈ $2,500
- CPU cores 6 vs 4
- Thickness 26 mm vs 28 mm
- Max CPU clock 4.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Video memory 4 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 256 GB vs 512 GB
4% cheaper ≈ $2,000
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 1,920 vs 1,024
- SSD (up to) 256 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.9 kg vs 2.7 kg
7% pricier ≈ $2,200
- CPU cores 8 vs 4
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 2.7 kg
- GPU shader cores 1,536 vs 1,024
- Screen size 15.6″ vs 17.3″
6% pricier ≈ $2,200
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 1,536 vs 1,024
- SSD (up to) 256 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.9 kg vs 2.7 kg
6% cheaper ≈ $1,950
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 2,304 vs 1,024
12% cheaper ≈ $1,800
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 1,920 vs 1,024
- Screen size 15.6″ vs 17.3″
39% pricier ≈ $2,900
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.7 kg
- Thickness 26 mm vs 28 mm
- Video memory 3 GB vs 8 GB
- Screen size 15.6″ vs 17.3″
11% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,024
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
29% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Bluetooth 4 vs 5