NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
Search/2026
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
CompareRankings
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. FX705D GTX 1650 (2019) vs Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)

Asus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019) vs Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)

What FX705D GTX 1650 (2019) does better (0) and where Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021) wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Asus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)
Asus · 2019FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)
3.5Score
0 advantages≈ $2,050
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)
Medion · 2021Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)
5.0Score
12 advantages≈ $1,850
Higher score
2.0Memory & storage2.2
2.1Battery & portability8.8
2.0Features & cooling3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)
399 × 27928395 × 26226
FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)Difference
Depth279 mm262 mm+17 mm
Width399 mm395 mm+4 mm
Thickness28 mm26 mm+2 mm
Weight2.7 kg2.3 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is FX705D GTX 1650 (2019) better than Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)?

FX705D GTX 1650 (2019) has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021) better than FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)?

  1. RAM (up to)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. GPU shader cores1,024 vs 5,1205×
  3. Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  4. CPU cores4 vs 82×
  5. SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
  6. Weight2.7 kg vs 2.3 kg+17%
  7. RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  8. HDMI 2.1No · FX705D GTX 1650 (2019): Yes
  9. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  10. SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
  11. Thickness28 mm vs 26 mm+8%
  12. Max CPU clock3.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)Asus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)≈ $2,0503.5
Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)≈ $1,8505.0
Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce GTX 1650 LaptopGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
Video memory8 GB16 GB
Video memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
GPU shader cores1,0245,120
Processor
ProcessorRyzen 5 3550HRyzen 7 5800H
CPU makerAMDAMD
CPU cores48
Max CPU clock3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Display
Screen size17.3″17.3″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Panel type—IPS
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)8 GB16 GB
RAM (base)8 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR4DDR4
RAM speed2,400 MHz—
SSD (up to)512 GB1,000 GB
SSD (base)512 GB1,000 GB
Battery & power
Battery capacity—91 Wh
Power adapter120 W—
Design & cooling
Weight2.7 kg2.3 kg
Thickness28 mm26 mm
Width399 mm395 mm
Depth279 mm262 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4NoNo
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1NoYes
Ethernet1 Gbit/s—
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card reader—Yes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5—
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes

Related comparisons

MSI GL75-10S RTX 2070 (2020)vsAsus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)MSI GL75-10S RTX 2070 (2020)vsAsus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)3.53.5Asus ROG Strix G G731 RTX 2060 (2019)vsAsus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)Asus ROG Strix G G731 RTX 2060 (2019)vsAsus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)3.53.5Asus ROG Strix G G731 GTX 1660 Ti (2019)vsAsus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)Asus ROG Strix G G731 GTX 1660 Ti (2019)vsAsus FX705D GTX 1650 (2019)3.53.5Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)7.25.0Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.05.7Asus TUF Gaming F15 RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)Asus TUF Gaming F15 RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)4.75.0
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare