≈ $5,000
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,424 vs 14,897
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 26.5 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
Alternatives to Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Acer · 2023
Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)Core i9-13900HX175 W15.6″2.98 kg
8.4
Alternatives to the Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)
≈ $4,200
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- SSD (up to) 16,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- CPU cores 10 vs 24
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 22,701 vs 14,897
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 26.5 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 4,608
≈ $6,800
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 14,897
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 1,874
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,774 vs 14,897
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 26.5 TFLOPS
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,022 vs 14,897
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 26.5 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 22,259 vs 14,897
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 26.5 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,000
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 512 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.98 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 26.5 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.98 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 175 W
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 780 vs 1,874