Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023) vs HP Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)
What Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023) does better (14) and where Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
8.4Score
Higher score 14 advantages
vs
8.8Graphics9.6
9.1Overall performance9.0
7.5Display4.4
6.3Memory & storage6.3
3.2Battery & portability3.0
7.4Features & cooling6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)
| Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023) | Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280.8 mm | 262 mm | +18.8 mm |
| Width | 359.4 mm | 397.1 mm | −37.7 mm |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 27 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.8 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Resolution class4K (2160p/2400p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core18,317 vs 14,604+25%
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,874 vs 1,369+37%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 127 ppi2.2×
- HDRYes · Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- SD card readerYes · Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- CPU threads32 vs 24+33%
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,897 vs 25,774+73%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.5 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS+71%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 9,7282.1×
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Response time28 ms vs 7 ms4×
- Weight2.98 kg vs 2.78 kg+7%
- USB-A ports1 vs 22×
- Thickness27.9 mm vs 27 mm+3%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.5 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,897 | 25,774 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900HX | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900HX | Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,317 | 14,604 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,095 | 2,696 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,874 | 1,369 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | 4K (2160p/2400p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 28 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 90% | — |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.98 kg | 2.78 kg |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 359.4 mm | 397.1 mm |
| Depth | 280.8 mm | 262 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.48.3vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)8.48.1vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Vector GP78 RTX 4070 (2023)8.48.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED RTX 4060 (2023)8.48.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Flow X16 RTX 4050 (2023)8.48.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)8.48.4