6% cheaper ≈ $2,150
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Max. supported RAM 96 GB vs 32 GB
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)
15% pricier ≈ $2,600
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 180 Hz
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- IR camera (face login)
15% pricier ≈ $2,600
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Max. supported RAM 128 GB vs 32 GB
- Ethernet 5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 180 Hz
- IR camera (face login)
6% cheaper ≈ $2,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.25 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
17% cheaper ≈ $1,900
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Webcam 1,440p vs 720p
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
24% cheaper ≈ $1,750
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Thickness 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Webcam 1,080p vs 720p
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
20% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- Weight 2 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Max. supported RAM 96 GB vs 32 GB
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
24% pricier ≈ $2,800
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 76 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 180 Hz
- Thickness 28 mm vs 25 mm
36% pricier ≈ $3,100
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 76 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Thickness 29 mm vs 25 mm
Same price ≈ $2,350
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 180 Hz
- Thickness 27 mm vs 25 mm