Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026) does better (2) and where TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display8.2
2.4Memory & storage2.4
5.2Battery & portability8.5
6.4Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026) | TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275 mm | 269 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 354 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 27 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- Thickness25 mm vs 27 mm+8%
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- CPU cores10 vs 16+60%
- Weight2.4 kg vs 2.2 kg+9%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 275 mm | 269 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)5.76.1
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 5060 (2025)6.16.4
vs
MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)6.66.1
vs
Alienware 15 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)6.36.1
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)6.36.1
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)6.46.1

