- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 57 Wh
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,130
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45 GTX 1650 (2021)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 5 AN515-45 GTX 1650 (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 5 AN515-45 GTX 1650 (2021)
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 57 Wh
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- Fan noise (max. load) 56 dB vs 49.1 dB
- Pixel density 137 ppi vs 141 ppi
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,819 vs 3,523
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,130
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,729 vs 3,523
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,130
≈ $2,800
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Brightness 250 nits vs 300 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.9 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,474 vs 3,523
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 57 Wh
- Fan noise (max. load) 56 dB vs 49.1 dB
- Pixel density 137 ppi vs 141 ppi
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.1 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,705 vs 3,523
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 57 Wh
- Fan noise (max. load) 56 dB vs 49.1 dB
- Pixel density 137 ppi vs 141 ppi
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Response time 35 ms vs 11 ms
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.9 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 57 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 75 W
- Thickness 26.8 mm vs 23.9 mm
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 57 Wh
- Thickness 26.8 mm vs 23.9 mm