Same price ≈ $2,250
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.81 kg
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 180 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,170 vs 18,910
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $2,200
6.8
Alternatives to the Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Same price ≈ $2,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,791 vs 18,910
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS
30% pricier ≈ $2,900
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,687 vs 18,910
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS
7% pricier ≈ $2,350
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 1.8 kg vs 2.81 kg
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,788 vs 18,910
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS
17% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,184 vs 18,910
- Video memory 8 GB vs 12 GB
15% pricier ≈ $2,500
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 1.88 kg vs 2.81 kg
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,249 vs 18,910
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS
Same price ≈ $2,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 1.63 kg vs 2.81 kg
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 180 Hz
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 76 Wh
38% pricier ≈ $3,100
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 20 vs 8
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,525 vs 18,910
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS
7% pricier ≈ $2,350
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 1.63 kg vs 2.81 kg
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 180 Hz
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 5,888
11% pricier ≈ $2,450
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- Panel type OLED vs IPS