- pan.tf
- Compare
- Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (3) and where Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Score
Higher score 14 advantages≈ $2,450
9.0Graphics9.0
8.1Overall performance9.7
7.7Display9.6
5.4Memory & storage7.0
2.2Battery & portability2.2
3.5Features & cooling4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 276 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 20 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight2.18 kg vs 2.3 kg+6%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light18,910 vs 19,783+5%
- HDRNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- IR camera (face login)No · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 26.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 18,910 | 19,783 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,587 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,862 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 896 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | — | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.18 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 54 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)7.48.0vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.47.6vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)7.47.5vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.47.6
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.0