7% cheaper ≈ $1,300
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.81 kg
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- CPU cores 10 vs 8
- Battery capacity 63 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)
8% pricier ≈ $1,500
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Same price ≈ $1,400
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 400 nits
- Weight 1.87 kg vs 2.81 kg
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
4% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.81 kg
- Thickness 18 mm vs 20 mm
- Battery capacity 63 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
8% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Weight 1.46 kg vs 2.81 kg
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Response time 3 ms vs 9 ms
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 76 Wh
6% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.81 kg
- Response time 4 ms vs 9 ms
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s
8% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.81 kg
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s
19% pricier ≈ $1,650
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.81 kg
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Response time 4 ms vs 9 ms
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s
31% pricier ≈ $1,850
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
23% pricier ≈ $1,700
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 1.9 kg vs 2.81 kg
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s