vs
2.1Memory & storage2.2
2.0Battery & portability3.7
5.4Features & cooling2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025)
| Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025) | V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 250 mm | +26 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm | = |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025) better than V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 63 Wh+21%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025): No
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025) better than Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Weight2.81 kg vs 1.95 kg+44%
- Thickness20 mm vs 18 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Response time | 9 ms | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 63 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.81 kg | 1.95 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 250 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus V16 V3607 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)4.23.8
vsAcer Nitro V16S AI ANV16S-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)3.73.8
vsInfinix GT Book RTX 3050 (2024)vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)3.93.8vsInfinix GT Book RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5050 (2025)4.13.8vs
Acer Nitro V16S AI ANV16S-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025)3.73.9vsAsus V16 V3607 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus V16 V3607 RTX 4050 (2025)4.23.9