≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,260 vs 8,781
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 3.1 kg vs 2.8 kg
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)
≈ $3,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,065 vs 8,781
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,100
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,240 vs 8,781
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $5,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,424 vs 8,781
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,750
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,292 vs 8,781
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,196 vs 8,781
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $4,200
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 8,781
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 11,921
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,926 vs 8,781
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 11,559 vs 11,921
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,260 vs 8,781
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 11,559 vs 11,921
≈ $2,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,045 vs 8,781
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB