vs
9.8Display9.5
2.4Memory & storage3.5
4.9Battery & portability9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025) | Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 254 mm | +12 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 23 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.2 kg+14%
- Thickness28 mm vs 23 mm+22%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 240 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 254 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.9
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)7.16.9
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.29.0
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)8.99.0
