vs
3.2Display6.8
8.0Memory & storage9.7
7.6Battery & portability2.5
6.4Features & cooling2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5060 (2025)
| Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025) | Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 245.2 mm | 276 mm | −30.8 mm |
| Width | 359.3 mm | 398 mm | −38.7 mm |
| Thickness | 23.1 mm | 28 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Weight2.1 kg vs 2.7 kg+29%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- Thickness23.1 mm vs 28 mm+21%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity55 Wh vs 75 Wh+36%
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,000 GB+95%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 60 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 15 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,167 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,357 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,544 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 597 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 65% | — |
| Response time | 23 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 43% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 96 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 55 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 23.1 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 359.3 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 245.2 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 50 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Zone RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | No |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
MSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.86.8vs
MSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.8
vsMSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)5.86.8vsMSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)6.16.8