Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs MSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (8) and where Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Memory & storage7.9
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity99 Wh vs 55 Wh+79%
- Refresh rate300 Hz vs 144 Hz2.1×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 4,608+28%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 60 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 15 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 11,167 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 9,357 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,544 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 597 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 65% |
| Response time | — | 23 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 43% |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 1 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 55 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | — | 23.1 mm |
| Width | — | 359.3 mm |
| Depth | — | 245.2 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)