vs
4.0Display9.2
9.6Memory & storage3.4
8.3Battery & portability8.3
5.9Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026)
| Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026) | Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249 mm | 253 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 27 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026) better than Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)96 GB vs 32 GB3×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Weight2 kg vs 2.35 kg+18%
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 27 mm+18%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026) better than Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)?
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 100 Wh+66%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 4,608+38%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SD card readerNo · Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 100 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16.6 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,735 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | — |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core 7 240H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,249 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,437 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 846 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 96 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | 250 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.35 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 249 mm | 253 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)8.48.0
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)8.18.0vs
MSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)8.08.4
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026)
vsMSI Crosshair A16 HX E8W RTX 5070 (2026)vsXMG Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026)8.18.0
vsMSI Katana 15 HX C14 RTX 5070 (2026)vsXMG Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026)8.28.0