vs
4.0Display9.8
9.6Memory & storage3.4
8.3Battery & portability6.0
5.9Features & cooling9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
| Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026) | Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249 mm | 260 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 28 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.6 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026) better than Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)96 GB vs 32 GB3×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Weight2 kg vs 2.65 kg+32%
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 28 mm+22%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)?
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 100 Wh+66%
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 10,4963.2×
- Brightness300 nits vs 1,000 nits3.3×
- CPU cores10 vs 242.4×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026): Yes
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SD card readerNo · Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 100 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16.6 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,735 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 7 240H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,249 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,437 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 846 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 96 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 249 mm | 260 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)8.48.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)8.18.0
vs
MSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)vsXMG Pro 16 VE RTX 5070 (2026)8.08.0
vs
XMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)8.18.4
vs
XMG Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)8.18.4
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)9.08.4
