vs
3.5Battery & portability6.7
8.4Features & cooling2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023)
| Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) | Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 250.3 mm | +18.7 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 359.4 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 22.9 mm | +7.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,0482.2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- SD card readerYes · Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023) better than Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Weight2.37 kg vs 1.98 kg+20%
- Thickness30 mm vs 22.9 mm+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 40 W |
| Video memory | — | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 4,001 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | — | Core i5-12450H |
| CPU maker | — | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-12450H, Core i7-12650H, Core i7-13620H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 9,731 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,292 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 605 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | — | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 63% |
| Response time | — | 18 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 42% |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | — | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | — | 8 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | — | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | — | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 1 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.37 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 22.9 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 359.4 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 250.3 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 1 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 56.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.66.6
vsMSI Crosshair 15 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.66.6
vsAcer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.76.6
vsLenovo LOQ 16IRH8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.76.6
vsMSI Sword 17 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.6
vsMSI Sword 15 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.6