Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) vs MSI Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (2) and where Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Memory & storage4.4
2.0Battery & portability4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) | Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275 mm | 262 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 396 mm | 359 mm | +37 mm |
| Thickness | 31 mm | 26 mm | +5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Screen size17.3″ vs 15.6″+11%
Why is Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity53 Wh vs 75 Wh+42%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Thickness31 mm vs 26 mm+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.2 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 53 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 31 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 396 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 275 mm | 262 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)3.83.6
vsMSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)4.03.6vs
Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)3.64.1vs
Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)3.63.8
vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)4.33.6vs
Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender P15 RTX 5060 (2025)3.63.6