Lenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) vs Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)
What LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) does better (2) and where Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Memory & storage3.4
5.5Battery & portability2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)
| LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) | Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 256 mm | 275 mm | −19 mm |
| Width | 361 mm | 396 mm | −35 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 31 mm | −6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) better than Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 53 Wh+13%
- Thickness25 mm vs 31 mm+24%
Why is Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025) better than LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 170 | Core 7 240H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| Processor options | Core i5-13450HX, Ryzen 7 170 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | — |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 31 mm |
| Width | 361 mm | 396 mm |
| Depth | 256 mm | 275 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)5.03.8
vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)4.53.8
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)3.83.8
vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)5.03.8
vsAlienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)4.83.8vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)3.83.6