Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs XMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

What Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) does better (5) and where Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

5.4Score

5 advantages≈ $3,100

8.0Score

5 advantages≈ $3,500

Higher score

2.6Memory & storage3.5

4.0Battery & portability6.0

8.4Features & cooling8.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Specifications

Only differences	Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)≈ $3,1005.4	XMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)≈ $3,5008.0
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
Video memory	12 GB	12 GB
Video memory type	—	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	7,424	5,888
Processor
Processor	Core i9-14900HX	Ryzen 9 9955HX
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	24	16
Max CPU clock	5.6 GHz	5.4 GHz
Processor options	Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX	—
Display
Screen size	17.3″	16″
Resolution	2560 × 1600	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	QHD (1440p/1600p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	240 Hz	300 Hz
Panel type	—	Mini-LED
Brightness	—	500 nits
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	32 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	32 GB	32 GB
SSD (up to)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
SSD (base)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
Battery & power
Battery capacity	100 Wh	100 Wh
Power adapter	—	330 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.86 kg	2.65 kg
Thickness	33 mm	28 mm
Width	383 mm	357 mm
Depth	272 mm	260 mm
Colours	Black	Black
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	—
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	No
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	Yes
Ethernet	—	5 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	—
Bluetooth	5.1	5
Keyboard & camera
Webcam	1,080p	1,080p
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2 speakers