vs
8.6Memory & storage2.6
5.8Battery & portability4.0
5.1Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
| LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024) | Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 258.7 mm | 272 mm | −13.3 mm |
| Width | 359.9 mm | 383 mm | −23.1 mm |
| Thickness | 23.9 mm | 33 mm | −9.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.9 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Weight2.38 kg vs 2.86 kg+20%
- Thickness23.9 mm vs 33 mm+38%
Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 100 Wh+66%
- Video memory4 GB vs 12 GB3×
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 7,4243.6×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SD card readerNo · LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock4.4 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+27%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 65 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3,945 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12450H | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-12450H, Core i5-12450HX, Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-12650HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14700HX | Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,325 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,238 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 595 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 170 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 140 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.38 kg | 2.86 kg |
| Thickness | 23.9 mm | 33 mm |
| Width | 359.9 mm | 383 mm |
| Depth | 258.7 mm | 272 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsLenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.1vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.15.3vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.15.0
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7
vsHP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4