NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
Search/2026
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
CompareRankings
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs XMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)

What Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) does better (4) and where Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
Medion · 2024Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $3,100
vs
XMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
XMG · 2025Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
9.0Score
6 advantages≈ $2,900
Higher score
2.6Memory & storage3.5
4.0Battery & portability9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
383 × 27233357 × 25423
Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)Difference
Depth272 mm254 mm+18 mm
Width383 mm357 mm+26 mm
Thickness33 mm23 mm+10 mm
Weight2.9 kg2.2 kg+0.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?

  1. GPU shader cores7,424 vs 4,608+61%
  2. Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
  4. Max CPU clock5.6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%

Why is Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?

  1. Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
  2. SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
  3. Weight2.86 kg vs 2.2 kg+30%
  4. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
  5. Thickness33 mm vs 23 mm+43%
  6. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)≈ $3,1005.4
XMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)XMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)≈ $2,9009.0
Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4080 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
Video memory12 GB8 GB
Video memory type—GDDR7
GPU shader cores7,4244,608
Processor
ProcessorCore i9-14900HXCore Ultra 9 275HX
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores2424
Max CPU clock5.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Processor optionsCore i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX—
Display
Screen size17.3″16″
Resolution2560 × 16002880 × 1800
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)3K (1800p/2000p)
Refresh rate240 Hz300 Hz
Panel type—IPS
Brightness—500 nits
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB32 GB
RAM (base)32 GB32 GB
SSD (up to)1,000 GB2,000 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB1,000 GB
Battery & power
Battery capacity100 Wh100 Wh
Power adapter—240 W
Design & cooling
Weight2.86 kg2.2 kg
Thickness33 mm23 mm
Width383 mm357 mm
Depth272 mm254 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPort—Yes
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYes—
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15
Keyboard & camera
Webcam1,080p—
Audio
Speakers2 speakers—

Related comparisons

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7Lenovo LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Lenovo LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.45.4Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.65.4Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare