vs
2.6Memory & storage7.4
4.0Battery & portability2.1
8.4Features & cooling4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024)
| Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) | Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 272 mm | 273 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 383 mm | 398 mm | −15 mm |
| Thickness | 33 mm | 25.2 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.9 kg | 2.7 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity100 Wh vs 54 Wh+87%
- GPU shader cores7,424 vs 2,5602.9×
- CPU cores24 vs 83×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Video memory12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SD card readerYes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Max CPU clock5.6 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+10%
Why is Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Weight2.86 kg vs 2.7 kg+6%
- Thickness33 mm vs 25.2 mm+31%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 105 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 11.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 8,387 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 13,581 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,703 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 968 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 59% |
| Response time | — | 26 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 40% |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 100 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.86 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 33 mm | 25.2 mm |
| Width | 383 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 272 mm | 273 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 59.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7
vs
MSI Creator M14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.75.4
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.75.4
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4
vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4

