vs
2.4Memory & storage5.8
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Titan 18 HX A14 RTX 4090 (2024)?
Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Titan 18 HX A14 RTX 4090 (2024) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 9,728+27%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 26,387 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | — | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 20,224 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,285 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,912 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3840 × 2400 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | — | Mini-LED |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 192 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 4 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 3 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 3.6 kg |
| Thickness | — | 24 mm |
| Width | — | 404 mm |
| Depth | — | 308 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 62.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsMSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsMSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)