Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
What ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (7) and where Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Memory & storage2.4
Why is ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Resolution class4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to)4,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): No
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,680+37%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | — |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 51.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 30,125 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2400 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 4K (2160p/2400p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | — |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | — |
| Brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 168 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 380 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.3 kg | — |
| Thickness | 32 mm | — |
| Width | 399 mm | — |
| Depth | 298 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.7 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)9.08.9vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5090 (2026)9.09.2vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5050 (2025)9.03.6vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMSI Titan 18 HX Dragon Edition Draco Epic A2WJ RTX 5090 (2026)9.08.2vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5080 (2025)9.08.7
vsAcer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)9.49.0