Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) vs XMG Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025)

What Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) does better (2) and where Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025) wins (2) — every spec side by side.

8.6Score

2 advantages≈ $4,100

Higher score

8.1Score

2 advantages≈ $4,700

9.8Display9.8

3.7Memory & storage3.7

Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) better than Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025)?

Specifications

Only differences	Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)≈ $4,1008.6	XMG Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025)≈ $4,7008.1
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
Video memory	24 GB	16 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	10,496	7,680
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	—	16
Max CPU clock	—	5.4 GHz
Processor options	Core Ultra 9 275HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus	—
Display
Screen size	16″	16″
Resolution	2560 × 1440	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	QHD (1440p/1600p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	300 Hz	300 Hz
Panel type	Mini-LED	Mini-LED
Brightness	—	500 nits
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:10
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	32 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	32 GB	32 GB
SSD (up to)	2,000 GB	2,000 GB
SSD (base)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
Battery & power
Battery capacity	99 Wh	100 Wh
Power adapter	—	330 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	—	2.65 kg
Thickness	—	28 mm
Width	—	357 mm
Depth	—	260 mm
Colours	Black	Black
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
HDMI	—	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	No	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	Yes
Ethernet	—	5 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	—	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	—	5
Keyboard & camera
Webcam	—	1,080p
Audio
Speakers	—	2 speakers