- pan.tf
- Compare
- Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) vs Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) vs MSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)
What Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) does better (3) and where Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.8
2.6Memory & storage3.2
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) better than Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 4,6082.3×
- Refresh rate300 Hz vs 240 Hz+25%
Why is Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Panel typeMini-LED vs OLED
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | OLED |
| Brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 240 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | — | 20 mm |
| Width | — | 356 mm |
| Depth | — | 260 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.0vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025)8.18.2vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)8.18.2vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)8.18.1
vsMSI Katana 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)8.18.1