vs
4.8Graphics3.8
3.9Overall performance2.9
6.0Display3.2
2.5Memory & storage3.0
7.0Battery & portability7.9
4.0Features & cooling4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5050 (2025)
| LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025) | Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 256 mm | 245 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 361 mm | 359 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 23 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)65 W vs 45 W+44%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- GPU compute (FP32)12.2 TFLOPS vs 8.6 TFLOPS+42%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,065 vs 7,442+35%
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 55 Wh+9%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 2,560+30%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- sRGB coverage100% vs 65%+54%
Why is Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5050 (2025) better than LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- CPU cores6 vs 10+67%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.95 kg+18%
- Max. supported RAM16 GB vs 96 GB6×
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
- Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 65 W | 45 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.2 TFLOPS | 8.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,065 | 7,442 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 170 | Core 7 240H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13450HX, Ryzen 7 1700, Ryzen 7 170 | Core i5-13420H, Core 7 240H |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 65% |
| Response time | — | 23 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 43% |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 16 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 55 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 140 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.95 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 361 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 256 mm | 245 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Zone RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | No |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)5.34.9
vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)5.34.9vs
Lenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026)4.94.3
vsLenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)5.04.9
vsHP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)4.84.9vsHP Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2025)4.94.9