Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026) vs Lenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)
What Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026) does better (4) and where LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Memory & storage2.1
5.2Battery & portability5.5
4.6Features & cooling2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)
| Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026) | LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275 mm | 256 mm | +19 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 361 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 25 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026) better than LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 60 Wh+27%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026): No
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 2,560+30%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) better than Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)?
- Weight2.4 kg vs 2.3 kg+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 2,560 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 170 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-13450HX, Ryzen 7 170 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 100 W | 135 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 361 mm |
| Depth | 275 mm | 256 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)5.75.0vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 5060 (2025)5.06.4
vsAlienware 15 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)5.25.0
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)5.05.0
vsAlienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)4.85.0vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.05.1