vs
6.0Display4.2
8.6Memory & storage3.2
5.8Battery & portability6.4
5.1Features & cooling2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)
| LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024) | Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 258.7 mm | 240 mm | +18.7 mm |
| Width | 359.9 mm | 360 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 23.9 mm | 24 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.1 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 53 Wh+13%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024) better than LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 4,6082.2×
- Video memory4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Weight2.38 kg vs 2.1 kg+13%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- SD card readerNo · LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024): Yes
- Max CPU clock4.4 GHz vs 4.9 GHz+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 65 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3,945 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12450H | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-12450H, Core i5-12450HX, Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-12650HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14700HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,325 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,238 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 595 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 170 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 140 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.38 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 23.9 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 359.9 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 258.7 mm | 240 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsLenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.1vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.15.3vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.45.0
vsMSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)4.85.0
vsHP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.15.0