vs
2.5Graphics3.1
4.1Overall performance4.4
6.2Display6.2
6.3Memory & storage6.3
6.2Battery & portability6.2
3.9Features & cooling3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 Ti (2022)
| Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022) | Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 Ti (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 260 mm | 260 mm | = |
| Width | 370 mm | 370 mm | = |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 23.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.4 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022) better than Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 Ti (2022)?
Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 Ti (2022) better than Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)?
- GPU compute (FP32)6.7 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS+22%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light4,973 vs 5,882+18%
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 2,560+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 75 W | 75 W |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.7 TFLOPS | 8.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 4,973 | 5,882 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12500H | Core i5-12500H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 12 | 12 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-12500H, Core i7-12700H | Core i5-12500H, Core i7-12700H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,894 | 9,894 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,253 | 2,253 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 784 | 784 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | No | No |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Width | 370 mm | 370 mm |
| Depth | 260 mm | 260 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Silver | Silver |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-57 RTX 3070 (2022)4.95.0vs
HP Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)4.94.9
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 3050 (2022)vsHP Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)4.84.9
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-42 RTX 3060 (2022)vsHP Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)4.84.9
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-46 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsHP Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)4.84.9
vsDell G15 5525 RTX 3060 (2022)vsHP Victus 16 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)4.94.9