vs
4.9Memory & storage2.6
6.2Battery & portability8.8
3.0Features & cooling3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)
| Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022) | Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 260 mm | 262 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 370 mm | 395 mm | −25 mm |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 26 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022) better than Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thickness23.5 mm vs 26 mm+11%
Why is Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) better than Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)?
- Video memory4 GB vs 32 GB8×
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 5,1202.5×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 91 Wh+30%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight2.4 kg vs 2.3 kg+4%
- CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Screen size16.1″ vs 17.3″+7%
- Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 75 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 5,120 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.7 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,056 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 6600H | Core i7-11800H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 6600H, Ryzen 7 6800H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 8,924 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,060 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 579 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 350 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 91 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 370 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 260 mm | 262 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Silver | — |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)vsLenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3060 (2022)4.43.9vs
HP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 3050 (2022)4.44.0
vsHP Victus 15 AMD RTX 3050 (2023)vsHP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)3.84.4
vsDell G15 5525 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsHP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)4.34.4
vsDell G15 5520 RTX 3050 (2022)vsHP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)4.44.4
vsHP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2021)vsHP Victus 16 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)4.04.4