HP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022)
What Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (9) and where Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Graphics9.3
9.1Overall performance8.9
4.7Display6.5
6.4Memory & storage5.4
7.3Battery & portability5.1
5.6Features & cooling4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022)
| Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 263.5 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 356.6 mm | 358.1 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 19.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.5 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Weight2.09 kg vs 2.5 kg+20%
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022): No
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,317 vs 1,122+17%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+17%
- Fan noise (max. load)47 dB vs 54.2 dB+15%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,578 vs 2,474+4%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+4%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 98%+2%
Why is Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022) better than Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)130 W vs 175 W+35%
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity97 Wh vs 100 Wh+3%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 7,424+61%
- GPU compute (FP32)21.2 TFLOPS vs 25.4 TFLOPS+20%
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- HDRNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- USB-C ports2 vs 42×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 130 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.2 TFLOPS | 25.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,037 | 13,174 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Core i7-12800HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX | Core i7-12800HX, Core i9-12900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,310 | 14,103 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,578 | 2,474 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,317 | 1,122 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 98% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 69% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 97 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 300 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.09 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 19.4 mm |
| Width | 356.6 mm | 358.1 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 263.5 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | White, Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 47 dB | 54.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 4 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)5.68.3
vsAsus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3
vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.28.3vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)6.28.3
vsAlienware X16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 RTX 4090 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.3