pan.tf
Compare
Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)

HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) vs MSI Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)

What Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (8) and where Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

HP · 2025Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

9.4Score

8 advantages≈ $4,300

Higher score

MSI · 2023Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)

6.3Score

5 advantages≈ $4,300

6.6Memory & storage7.1

5.9Battery & portability3.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)

	Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)	Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)	Difference
Depth	269 mm	308 mm	−39 mm
Width	357 mm	404 mm	−47 mm
Thickness	23 mm	30 mm	−7 mm
Weight	2.7 kg	3.6 kg	−0.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)?

Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
Video memory24 GB vs 12 GB2×
Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023): No
Weight2.68 kg vs 3.6 kg+34%
GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,424+41%
Thickness23 mm vs 30 mm+30%
Screen size16″ vs 14″+14%
RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%

Why is Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?

Battery capacity83 Wh vs 100 Wh+20%
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5.8 GHz+7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)≈ $4,3009.4	MSI Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)≈ $4,3006.3
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	175 W	—
Video memory	24 GB	12 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	10,496	7,424
GPU compute (FP32)	51.4 TFLOPS	—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	31,120	—
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 9 275HX	Core i9-14900HX
CPU maker	Intel	Intel
CPU cores	24	24
Max CPU clock	5.4 GHz	5.8 GHz
Processor options	Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Core Ultra 9 275HX	—
Display
Screen size	16″	14″
Resolution	2560 × 1600	3840 × 2160
Resolution class	QHD (1440p/1600p)	4K (2160p/2400p)
Refresh rate	240 Hz	120 Hz
Panel type	IPS	—
Brightness	500 nits	—
sRGB coverage	100%	—
Response time	3 ms	—
Pixel density	142 ppi	—
Aspect ratio	16:10	—
G-Sync / FreeSync	Yes	—
Advanced Optimus	No	—
MUX switch	Yes	—
HDR	No	—
Touchscreen	No	—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	64 GB
RAM (base)	64 GB	64 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	6,400 MHz	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	64 GB	—
RAM slots	2	—
Upgradable RAM	Yes	—
SSD (up to)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
SSD (base)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	—
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	—
Battery & power
Battery capacity	83 Wh	100 Wh
Power adapter	330 W	300 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	—
Design & cooling
Weight	2.68 kg	3.6 kg
Thickness	23 mm	30 mm
Width	357 mm	404 mm
Depth	269 mm	308 mm
Body material	Aluminium, Plastic	—
Colours	Black	Black
Cooling fans	2	—
Vapor chamber cooling	Yes	—
Liquid metal (CPU)	Yes	—
Fan noise (max. load)	61.1 dB	—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	—
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	No
USB-C ports	2	—
USB-A ports	2	—
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	—
HDMI 2.1	Yes	—
(Mini) DisplayPort	No	Yes
Ethernet	5 Gbit/s	—
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	No	—
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	—
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	—
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	—
Numeric keypad	Yes	—
Key travel	1.5 mm	—
Webcam	1,080p	—
Fingerprint reader	No	—
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	—
Dolby Atmos	No	—