HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
What Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (6) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Memory & storage4.3
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): No
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,680+37%
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 99 Wh+19%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | — |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 51.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 31,120 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.68 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 61.1 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.09.4vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)9.49.5
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.4
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.29.4
vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.4
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.49.4