HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (11) and where Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Graphics9.0
9.0Overall performance9.6
8.9Display6.2
4.4Memory & storage9.5
5.9Battery & portability2.9
8.6Features & cooling8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 298 mm | −29 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 380.3 mm | −23.3 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 28.8 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 3 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 140 W+25%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- GPU compute (FP32)37.4 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+20%
- Weight2.68 kg vs 3 kg+12%
- Thickness23 mm vs 28.8 mm+25%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 133 ppi+7%
Why is Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJ RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 90 Wh+8%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light21,096 vs 21,874+4%
- SD card readerNo · Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- CPU cores20 vs 24+20%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 17″+6%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%
- Fan noise (max. load)61.1 dB vs 59.2 dB+3%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 37.4 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 21,096 | 21,874 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 24 |
| CPU threads | — | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 285HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 22,395 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,282 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 2,129 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 133 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.68 kg | 3 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 28.8 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 380.3 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 61.1 dB | 59.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.98.6vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.99.0vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Core 15 RTX 5070 (2025)8.99.2vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)8.99.0vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)8.99.5