HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (2) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Memory & storage2.6
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 99 Wh+19%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | — |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 37.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 21,096 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.68 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 61.1 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.98.6
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.99.0
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Core 15 RTX 5070 (2025)8.99.2
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)8.99.0
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)8.99.5
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)8.97.3

